Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tracing/syscalls: Rename variable 'nr' to 'syscall_nr'

From: Taeung Song
Date: Thu Feb 25 2016 - 13:31:28 EST


Hi, Arnaldo

On 02/26/2016 02:57 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:38:57AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
There is a problem about duplicated variable name i.e.
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/syscalls/sys_enter_io_getevents/format
name: sys_enter_io_getevents
ID: 739
format:
field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
field:int common_pid;offset:4;size:4;signed:1;
field:int nr; offset:8; size:4; signed:1;
field:aio_context_t ctx_id; offset:16; size:8; signed:0;
field:long min_nr; offset:24; size:8; signed:0;
field:long nr; offset:32; size:8; signed:0;
field:struct io_event * events; offset:40; size:8; signed:0;
field:struct timespec * timeout; offset:48; size:8; signed:0;

print fmt: "ctx_id: 0x%08lx, min_nr: 0x%08lx, nr: 0x%08lx,
events: 0x%08lx, timeout: 0x%08lx", ((unsigned long)(REC->ctx_id)),
((unsigned long)(REC->min_nr)), ((unsigned long)(REC->nr)),
((unsigned long)(REC->events)), ((unsigned long)(REC->timeout))

As above 'int nr;' and 'long nr;' variables have
duplicated name so problems are occurred in perf-script i.e.

# perf record -e syscalls:*
# perf script -g python
# perf script -s perf-script.py
File "perf-script.py", line 8694
def syscalls__sys_enter_io_getevents(event_name, context, common_cpu,
SyntaxError: duplicate argument 'nr' in function definition
Error running python script perf-script.py

Please test this with 'perf trace', which this patch breaks, this patch
should make it understand this 3rd variation of the non common list of
fields in syscall tracepoints:

OK, I will test it.
But IMHO, I think the bottom change has a problem.
Because sys_enter_io_getevent() has a argument 'long nr'.
So this if statement must not have strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr") == 0.

+ if (sc->args && strcmp(sc->args->name, "syscall_nr") == 0) {

I think the above instance seem better than the bottom.

+ if (sc->args && (strcmp(sc->args->name, "syscall_nr") || strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr")) == 0) {

But I'll test again with perf-trace.
And then will say the result.


diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index 20916dd77aac..b31eed102a83 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -1724,8 +1724,8 @@ static int trace__read_syscall_info(struct trace *trace, int id)

sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
sc->nr_args = sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields;
- /* drop nr field - not relevant here; does not exist on older kernels */
- if (sc->args && strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr") == 0) {
+ /* drop (syscall_)?nr field - not relevant here; does not exist on older kernels */
+ if (sc->args && (strcmp(sc->args->name, "syscall_nr") || strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr")) == 0) {
sc->args = sc->args->next;
--sc->nr_args;
}


----------------------

But then I wonder if it wouldn't be better to prefix this with double
underscores, making it "__syscall_nr" :-\


I so agree. Low probability but the name 'syscall_nr' may also
have similar problems.

Thanks,
Taeung