Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24

[Benjamin LaHaise]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 07:32:17AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20160223:
> >
> ...
> > The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20160111.
> >
> 
> Might be good to poke the maintainer as I am seeing this for a long
> time in Linux-next.

These are architecture code related build failures that arch maintainers 
need to fix.  Avoiding pulling the tree allows people to ignore the issue, 
which isn't going to get things fixed.  I provided an example how to 
implement the 64 bit __get_user() without generating warnings, and it is 
now up to maintainers to adapt it for their architecture.

		-ben

> - Sedat -

-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."