Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Enable and verify MMIO access

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/05/2016 04:29 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 01/02/16 19:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 02/01, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > So far, we have been blindly assuming that having access to a
> > > memory-mapped timer frame implies that the individual elements of that
> > > frame frame are already enabled. Whilst it's the firmware's job to give
> > > us non-secure access to frames in the first place, we should not rely
> > > on implementations always being generous enough to also configure CNTACR
> > > for those non-secure frames (e.g. [1]).
> > >
> > > Explicitly enable feature-level access per-frame, and verify that the
> > > access we want is really implemented before trying to make use of it.
> > >
> > > [1]:https://github.com/ARM-software/tf-issues/issues/170
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> Daniel, am I right in hoping this is something you'll pick up, or should
> I be resending it to arm-soc?

I will be reviewing timers patches next week. I will take care of this one.

Thanks
  -- Daniel



--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog