Re: [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: Add support for OCTEON cn78xx and cn73xx.

From: Aaro Koskinen
Date: Thu Feb 04 2016 - 20:22:43 EST

Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[PATCH 3/3 v3] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload"
In reply to: David Daney: "[PATCH 1/7] MIPS: OCTEON: Remove some code limiting NR_IRQS to 255"
Next in thread: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: Add support for OCTEON cn78xx and cn73xx."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:42:47PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The OCTEON III cn78xx and cn73xx family of SoCs has some architectural
> differences from previous OCTEON processors.

Did you test this series also on older OCTEONs? A lot of common files
seems to be modified, so it would be good to describe how it was tested.

A.

Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[PATCH 3/3 v3] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload"
In reply to: David Daney: "[PATCH 1/7] MIPS: OCTEON: Remove some code limiting NR_IRQS to 255"
Next in thread: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: Add support for OCTEON cn78xx and cn73xx."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]