Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: davicom: fix devicetree irq resource

From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Thu Feb 04 2016 - 15:42:29 EST


Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello.
>
> Your patch summary prefixes are too verbose, it was enough to say only
> "dm9000: ".
Well, I don't agree here. The subsystem should be fully specified, at least this
is something I require in pxa, something that is also required in sound/*, etc
... If David doesn't object, I'll keep it that way. As it's his tree, his
decision in the end, so let's have him decide.

>> - /* If there is no IRQ type specified, default to something that
>> - * may work, and tell the user that this is a problem */
>> -
>> - if (irqflags == IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE)
>> - irqflags = irq_get_trigger_type(dev->irq);
>> -
>> - if (irqflags == IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE)
>> + /* If there is no IRQ type specified, tell the user that this is a
>> + * problem */
>
> The networking code formats comments this way:
>
> /* foo
> * bar
> */
May I know where this is documented ?
I'm asking because I didn't find it, because I parsed drivers/net/*.c files, and
the standard kernel comment style was there, ie:
/*
* foo
* bar
*/

I was reusing the previous comment style, but I will change it for the standard
kernel style if you wish.

>>
>> + ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (ndev->irq <= 0) {
>
> I don't recommend checking for 0 and returning early in this case --
> you'll signal a probe success this way. Either ignore 0 or return -E<smth>
> in this case. Unfortunately, platform_get_irq() is so sloppily coded now that it
> *can* return 0 on error. :-(
Ah we had that discussion not very long ago, didn't we ? :)
And I think I'll reuse the "if (ndev->irq < 0) {" solution to be consistent with
myself.

Thanks for the review.

--
Robert