Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Feb 03 2016 - 01:59:26 EST
On 02-02-16, 21:06, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> I disagree. I think it's way better and simpler than this patch set. It also
> doesn't tie into cpufreq_governor.* which is a good thing IMO since it keeps
> things simpler for sched-dvfs too.
Lets discuss it further on the other thread ..
--
viresh