On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:Absolutelly! Please use SYNC - right now it is not.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:What Will said!
On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:You missed a point - it is a question about replacement of SYNC with
I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship withOf course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you
replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)?
introduce, how can we judge the patch.
lightweight primitives. It is NOT a question about multithread system
behavior without any SYNC. The answer on a latest Will's question lies in
different area.
Yes, you can cut corners within MIPS architecture-specific code,
but primitives that are used in the core kernel really do need to
work as expected.
Thanx, Paul