Re: fsl/fman: Clarification for implementation details in dtsec_config()

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Wed Jan 13 2016 - 17:09:38 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH v2] null_blk: use sector_div instead of do_div"
Previous message: Bjorn Helgaas: "mlx4 fails ("go bit not cleared") without MSI"
In reply to: Dan Carpenter: "Re: fsl/fman: Clarification for implementation details in dtsec_config()"
Next in thread: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH] fsl/fman: Delete one function call "put_device" in dtsec_config()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:35:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I think you can remove the put_device() line.

Agreed.

of_phy_find_device() only does a get_device() when it finds a matching
device.

Andrew

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH v2] null_blk: use sector_div instead of do_div"
Previous message: Bjorn Helgaas: "mlx4 fails ("go bit not cleared") without MSI"
In reply to: Dan Carpenter: "Re: fsl/fman: Clarification for implementation details in dtsec_config()"
Next in thread: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH] fsl/fman: Delete one function call "put_device" in dtsec_config()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]