Hello, Tang.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:20:25PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>This doesn't help people trying to read the patch. If you wanna say
This patch finishes step 4.
it's one of the steps of something, you also need to say what the
steps are. No need to duplicate the whole thing but a short summary
would be helpful.
This patch set the persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all enabled/disabledSo, the patchset generally looks good to me although I'm not too
processors at boot time via an additional acpi namespace walk for processors.
familiar with acpi. Rafael, Len, what do you think?
Thanks.