[PATCH v2 2/3] x86: drop a comment left over from X86_OOSTORE
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Tue Jan 12 2016 - 17:10:34 EST
The comment about wmb being non-nop is a left over from before commit
09df7c4c8097 ("x86: Remove CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE").
It makes no sense now: if you have an SMP system with out of order
stores, making wmb not a nop will not help.
Additionally, wmb is not a nop even for regular intel CPUs because of
weird use-cases e.g. dealing with WC memory.
Drop this comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
index 7f99726..eb220b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -11,11 +11,6 @@
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-/*
- * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. wmb() ceases to be a
- * nop for these.
- */
-
#define mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)" ::: "memory")
#define rmb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "lfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
#define wmb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "sfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM)
--
MST