Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mfd: dt-bindings: add device tree bindings for Hi3519 sysctrl

[xuejiancheng]

On 2016/1/11 16:55, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, xuejiancheng wrote:
>> On 2016/1/11 13:48, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>>>
>>>> Add device tree bindings for Hi3519 system controller.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
>>>
>>> I have this patch, but none of the others in the set, thus I am
>>> lacking context.
>>>
>> I can forward other patches in the set to you. Thank you.
>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..115c5be
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>>>> +* Hisilicon Hi3519 System Controller Block
>>>> +
>>>> +This bindings use the following binding:
>>>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
>>>> +
>>>> +Required properties:
>>>> +- compatible: "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl".
>>>> +- reg: the register region of this block
>>>> +
>>>> +Examples:
>>>> +sysctrl: system-controller@12010000 {
>>>> +	compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "syscon";
>>>> +	reg = <0x12010000 0x1000>;
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> There is no requirement (nor want) for binding documents where the
>>> given device is simply using highly generic bindings.  This just
>>> amounts to churn.
>>>
>> This block is specific for Hi3519 SOC, and may has its own driver.
> 
> Does it have its own driver currently?
> 
Not yet.
Arnd Bergmann and Rob Herring all suggested adding a specific compatible string
with the SOC name. This binding is just used for describing the compatible string now.
When more functions on hi3519 SOC are added later, the specific driver will be also
needed.

>> So I think it's better to keep this binding.
>