RE: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre/lustre/libcfs: Fix type mismatch reported by sparse

[Simmons, James A.]

>>>2. Is it OK to hardcode the appropriate gfp_t flags for the
>>>IOC_LIBCFS_MEMHOG, as the userspace
>>>seems to be taking the decision about the page allocation
>>>zone/strategy, is this what is intended?
>>
>> The memhog functionality is used to introduce memory pressure on a client
>> or server during operation to test error handling as well as memory
>> allocation deadlocks (e.g. GFP_KERNEL used where GFP_NOFS should be used).
>> There are other ways to do this in the kernel today, so all of the memhog
>> code could just be deleted I think.
>>
>> This looks like kportal_memhog_alloc(), kportal_memhog_free(),
>> IOC_LIBCFS_MEMHOG, and struct libcfs_device_userstate could be removed.
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>Thanks Andreas, I will send out a separate patch with the cleanup as
>you suggested.

I missed this email. I just sent the cleanup patches a bit ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/