Re: [PATCH 1/2] net-qmi_wwan: Refactoring for qmi_wwan_bind()

From: BjÃrn Mork
Date: Sat Jan 02 2016 - 16:38:47 EST


SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:32:07 +0100
>
> Reduce the scope for the local variable "desc" to one branch
> of an if statement.

This patch is harmless. But is also pointless.

You could at least try to explain why this must be changed. I'm not
interested in why you think it is better this way - I might agree with
that. what I am interested in is the advantage changing the code gives
us. Some analysis of the risk and work involved would also be nice. Is
this change really worth it?

Personally I am convinced that I wasted any time I used writing this,
and you wasted any time you used reading it. Sorry.

Note: This patch would have been fine if it was a natural part of some
*improvement* of the driver, i.e. a bugfix or feaure addition. As a
standalone patch I see it as noise.

Please stop the noise and start writing something useful. I'm sure you
can fix bugs instead. Wouldn't that be more interesting? More
challenging? These mindless robotic code refactoring patches are really
best left for robots.




BjÃrn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/