Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:36:30PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:12:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
Just a note for the future submissions (no need to respin), we are using
different subject line: InfiniBand-iSER: --> IB/iser:

> 
> I suggest to return directly instead of using the jump label "err"
> in two functions (which are working without clean-up there).
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   One jump label less in iser_reg_sig_mr()
>   One jump label less in isert_reg_sig_mr()
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c | 5 ++---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c   | 7 +++----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.6.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/