Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...

> It's entirely silent on the difference between static_cpu_has() and 
> static_cpu_has_safe() - what makes the second one 'safe'?

Yeah, those really are lacking some more fleshy and detailed
explanations. :-)

I'll document those properly.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/