Re: [PATCH] arch:arm:mm:Correction in the boundary check for module end address.

From: Hillf Danton
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 21:51:26 EST


> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35:50AM +0900, Jungseung Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-11-09 16:57 GMT+09:00 Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > From: Shailendra Verma <Shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The module end boundary check is not proper.The out of bound value
> > > of module end can produce undesired results.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <Shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ravikant Bijendra Sharma <ravikant.s2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c b/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c
> > > index cf30daf..be7fe4b 100644
> > > --- a/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c
> > > +++ b/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c
> > > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> > > if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - if (end < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
> > > + if (end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > data.set_mask = set_mask;
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > >
> > Same patch with proper format is already submitted by Hillf.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/3/202
>
> What happened to that patch? It should at least have had a:
>
> Fixes: f2ca09f381a5 ("ARM: 8311/1: Don't use is_module_addr in setting page attributes")
>
> tag on it, and it needs to find its way into the patch system. As
> no one has reported a crash (I don't think it's crash-causing, but is
> merely a correctness issue) I don't see any reason to backport it to
> stable trees.
>
> Other changes are needed here as well - the original commit creating
> this contains:
>
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + start &= PAGE_MASK;
> + end = start + size;
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + }
>
> which is truely amazing. Fine, it may not be intended to work with
> non-aligned addresses, but if we're going to round the start down,
> then rounding the end down as well like that is also buggy.
>
> unsigned long start = addr;
> unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE * numpages;
> unsigned long end = start + size;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> start &= PAGE_MASK;
> end = PAGE_ALIGN(end);
> }
>
> would be much better - this will round 'end' up, so we encompass the
> entire requested region.
>
Would you please respin, Shailendra, with Russell's comments
addressed, and with
Reported-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ?

thanks
Hillf


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/