Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 11/5/2015 6:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > It just grates at me a bit that we have to touch hot paths for such
> scenarios :/
> 
> well we have this as a driver right now that does not touch hot paths,
> but it seems you and tglx also hate that approach with a passion....

Right. It's a horror to deal with tasks which try to impersonate idle
while actually running as highest priority task in the system. We
really want the scheduler to know about it. Yes, we probably have to
pay the price for some extra check in the hot path, but that's way
more sensible than figuring out how 'want to be idle' RT tasks
wreckage the world and some more.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/