Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Be more precise with syscall arguments.

[Shuah Khan]

On 11/02/2015 12:49 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Robert Sesek <rsesek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Certain syscall emulation layers strictly check that the number of
>> arguments match what the syscall handler expects. The KILL_one_arg_one and
>> KILL_one_arg_six tests passed more parameters than expected to various
>> syscalls, causing failures in this emulation mode. Instead, test using
>> syscalls that take the appropriate number of arguments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks great, thanks!
> 
> Shuah, can you take this into the selftests tree?
> 

Robert,

Could you please send this patch to me. It didn't make to
my Inbox.

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/