Re: [GIT PULL] memremap fix for 4.3 (v2)

From: Dan Williams
Date: Sun Nov 01 2015 - 15:51:25 EST


On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 08:24:25PM +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
>> index 72b0c66628b6..9d6b55587eaa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ __weak void __iomem *ioremap_cache(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size)
>> +{
>> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +
>> + /* In the simple case just return the existing linear address */
>> + if (!PageHighMem(page))
>> + return __va(offset);
>> + return NULL; /* fallback to ioremap_cache */
>
> Right, so a highmem page results in this returning NULL, which will...
>
>> @@ -66,8 +76,8 @@ void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
>> * the requested range is potentially in "System RAM"
>> */
>> if (is_ram == REGION_INTERSECTS)
>> - addr = __va(offset);
>> - else
>> + addr = try_ram_remap(offset, size);
>> + if (!addr)
>> addr = ioremap_cache(offset, size);
>
> cause ioremap_cache() to be called. That falls through on ARM to:
>
> __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller()
>
> and we will hit this (as I've mentioned before through explanation
> rather than quoting code):
>
> /*
> * Don't allow RAM to be mapped - this causes problems with ARMv6+
> */
> if (WARN_ON(pfn_valid(pfn)))
> return NULL;
>

Right, which means the caller is broken and shouldn't be using
memremap, same as misuse of ioremap_cache today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/