Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

[Kieran Bingham]

Hi Wolfram,

On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all
> binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for drivers
> without i2c_device_ids.

Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week.

>  Also, for the last patch, a verification should
> be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile.

I'll see what I can do ...

> I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new function
> name. That should be it.

Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either way,
I'll do a rename for the next version

I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this
can make its way into the respin.

>
> Thanks,
>
>    Wolfram

Regards

Kieran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/