[PATCH 3.2 093/107] ipc/sem.c: fully initialize sem_array before making it visible

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thu Oct 08 2015 - 20:45:50 EST


3.2.72-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit e8577d1f0329d4842e8302e289fb2c22156abef4 upstream.

ipc_addid() makes a new ipc identifier visible to everyone. New objects
start as locked, so that the caller can complete the initialization
after the call. Within struct sem_array, at least sma->sem_base and
sma->sem_nsems are accessed without any locks, therefore this approach
doesn't work.

Thus: Move the ipc_addid() to the end of the initialization.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- Adjust context
- The error path being moved looks a little different]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -314,14 +314,6 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *
return retval;
}

- id = ipc_addid(&sem_ids(ns), &sma->sem_perm, ns->sc_semmni);
- if (id < 0) {
- security_sem_free(sma);
- ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
- return id;
- }
- ns->used_sems += nsems;
-
sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];

for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
@@ -332,6 +324,15 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->list_id);
sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
+
+ id = ipc_addid(&sem_ids(ns), &sma->sem_perm, ns->sc_semmni);
+ if (id < 0) {
+ security_sem_free(sma);
+ ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
+ return id;
+ }
+ ns->used_sems += nsems;
+
sem_unlock(sma);

return sma->sem_perm.id;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/