Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: fix declarations of nr, delta and nr_pagecache_reclaimable

From: Alexandru Moise
Date: Wed Sep 30 2015 - 01:36:36 EST


On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:28:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:10:04 +0300 Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > > >
> > > > static unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone)
> > > > {
> > > > - int nr;
> > > > + unsigned long nr;
> > > >
> > > > nr = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> > > > zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> >
> > Are you sure? Mel Gorman raised the following issue on patch 1/2:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/29/253
>
> __zone_watermark_ok() is very different from zone_reclaimable_pages().

Alright, in time I will gain a better understanding of this.
Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/