Re: [PATCH] x86/signal: Deinline get_sigframe, save 240 bytes

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Nothing really against or in favor of these patches, but I don't think that
> saving 240 bytes (or whatever) is worth such changes, in fact we have Josh's
> tinyfication project for those systems that do in fact care.

And what exactly is wrong with slimming down the mainline kernel? We
have tons of inlines which are way too fat and an extra unconditional
function call is not going to show up as a performance degradation by
any means.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/