Re: [PATCH 10/26] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue Sep 22 2015 - 16:03:52 EST


On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> +static inline u16 vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + u16 pkey = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> + unsigned long f = vma->vm_flags;
> + pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_0)) << 0;
> + pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_1)) << 1;
> + pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_2)) << 2;
> + pkey |= (!!(f & VM_HIGH_ARCH_3)) << 3;

Eew. What's wrong with:

pkey = (vma->vm_flags & VM_PKEY_MASK) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;

???

> +static u16 fetch_pkey(unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)

So here we get a u16 and assign it to si_pkey

> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) && si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
> + info.si_pkey = fetch_pkey(address, tsk);

which is int.

> + int _pkey; /* FIXME: protection key value??

Inconsistent at least.

Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/