Re: First kernel patch (optimization)

[Alexander Holler]

Am 21.09.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Austin S Hemmelgarn:

> The problem I see with this argument is:
> 1. There's a lot of code in the kernel that wouldn't be merged today in
> the state it's in, this creates a false sense of what quality is
> expected for new code (BTRFS in particular comes to mind here).

Just to say it a last time, THE CODE I'VE POSTED WAS NEVER MEANT FOR 
MERGING in that state. Regardless how many people will still come by and 
repeat that it was ugly, bad and broken to just use that as an 
additional argument against me.

I've absolutely no idea how you all start to test an idea and 
demonstrate it others, but I don't waste time on such tasks with looking 
for style, (premature) optimization or even races.

I know how write production ready code, doing such since a long time and 
I know how much time that costs, and I know that only fools (or students 
which have to show that they can write good code) spend this time for 
code which might end up in the waste bin anyway.

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/