Re: [PATCH 6/7] [RFC] [media]: v4l2: introduce v4l2_timeval

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Sep 16 2015 - 04:40:54 EST


On Wednesday 16 September 2015 10:12:00 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Are you also attending the ELCE in Dublin? We could have a quick talk there.
> I think the discussion whether to switch to a new v4l2_buffer struct isn't really
> dependent on anything y2038.

No, unfortunately I won't be there.

Concerning a v4l2_buffer, I agree we should treat that as a completely independent
topic. The problem at hand for y2038 is only about we expect to happen when someone
compiles source code that uses the existing v4l2_buffer (and v4l2_event) with a
y2038-aware libc.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/