Re: soc/tegra: fuse: undefined option ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC

[Valentin Rothberg]

Hi Thierry,

this is just a kind reminder that the issue (see below) is still present.

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 01:50:08PM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> your commit e3cf5bf687df ("soc/tegra: fuse: Add Tegra210 support") is
>> in today's linux-next tree (i.e., next-20150514).  The following lines
>> in the commit reference a Kconfig option that is not defined, so that
>> the driver and the affected #ifdef blocks cannot be compiled:
>>
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/Makefile:10:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC)
>>  += speedo-tegra210.o
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra.c:104:#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra30.c:49:    defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC)
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra30.c:148:#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC)
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse.h:84:#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse.h:104:#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC
>>
>> Is there a patch queued somewhere to add this option?
>
> Yes, these patches are all in the process of being merged for v4.2, so
> I'd expect this particular Kconfig option to show up sometime soon now.
>
> Thanks,
> Thierry

Kind regards,
 Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/