Re: [PATCH] PM-wakeup: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Fri Aug 14 2015 - 02:57:00 EST


On Sun 2015-06-28 12:21:53, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200
>
> The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test
> whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
> Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

ACK.


> ---
> drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> index 40f7160..3741bc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> @@ -341,8 +341,7 @@ void device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs(void)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) {
> - if (ws->wakeirq)
> - dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq);
> + dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> @@ -358,8 +357,7 @@ void device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs(void)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) {
> - if (ws->wakeirq)
> - dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq);
> + dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> @@ -396,9 +394,7 @@ int device_wakeup_disable(struct device *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ws = device_wakeup_detach(dev);
> - if (ws)
> - wakeup_source_unregister(ws);
> -
> + wakeup_source_unregister(ws);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_wakeup_disable);
> --
> 2.4.4

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/