Re: [PATCH 2/5] net: rfkill: add rfkill_find_type function

From: Johannes Berg
Date: Thu Aug 13 2015 - 05:27:55 EST


On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 16:39 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>
> +static const char *rfkill_types[NUM_RFKILL_TYPES] = {
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN] = "wlan",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH] = "bluetooth",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_UWB] = "ultrawideband",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_WIMAX] = "wimax",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN] = "wwan",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_GPS] = "gps",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_FM] = "fm",
> + [RFKILL_TYPE_NFC] = "nfc",
> +};
> +
> +enum rfkill_type rfkill_find_type(const char *name)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(NUM_RFKILL_TYPES != RFKILL_TYPE_NFC + 1);
>
That BUILD_BUG_ON() is now less useful - previously it pointed to the
code that needed to change, now you're left wondering if you don't look
up since it isn't quite that obvious from the code what this does.

Something like

BUILD_BUG_ON(rfkill_types[NUM_RFKILL_TYPES - 1] == NULL);

would be better. As we only add here, that would be safe enough - I've
done something similar in the past that a bit more complicated.

With that and the static inline fixed (which maybe you could even
remove) I'm fine with all these rfkill patches, but I'm not sure how to
merge them since they affect all kinds of other trees. If desired, I
can apply them, but an ACK from the tegra maintainer would be good :)

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/