Re: [PATCH 2/6] PM / OPP: restructure _of_init_opp_table_v2()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Aug 11 2015 - 02:57:50 EST


On 10-08-15, 23:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 10-08-15, 17:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > So ret is 0. I thought it was an error path, but I guess this is a
> > > warning path and we return 0 still?
> >
> > Urg ..
>
> Oh I see this is an existing problem... Same problem goes for the
> count check. It may be better to fix those two cases first and
> then do this cleanup. But I don't mind either way.

-------------------------8<-------------------------
Message-Id: <b2d2d842165ec1748a56ecc03b85bd89321a644b.1439276231.git.viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:22:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Return proper errors on failure

We are returning 0 by mistake, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 1daaa1a418a2..be3356a3a452 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -1292,14 +1292,18 @@ static int _of_init_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev,
}

/* There should be one of more OPP defined */
- if (WARN_ON(!count))
+ if (WARN_ON(!count)) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
+ }

if (!ret) {
if (!dev_opp) {
dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
- if (WARN_ON(!dev_opp))
+ if (WARN_ON(!dev_opp)) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
+ }
}

dev_opp->np = opp_np;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/