Re: [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Tue Aug 04 2015 - 07:24:42 EST


Hello Guenter,

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:13:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> This patch set does not solve all limitations of the watchdog subsystem.
> Specifically, it does not add support for the following features.
>
> - It is desirable to be able to specify a maximum early timeout,
> from booting the system to opening the watchdog device.
> - Some watchdogs may require a minimum period of time between
> heartbeats. Examples are DA9062 and possibly AT91SAM9x.

Other things that come to my mind:
- move handling of nowayout into the core
- some drivers use a reboot notifier. Not sure what they are intended
to do there. For i.MX2x it triggers a reboot; for gpio-wdt it tries
to stop the watchdog.

Of course this doesn't mean this should addressed here. I like the
series in general.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/