Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] block: Correct misuses of 0x%<decimal>

From: yalin wang
Date: Mon Aug 03 2015 - 22:19:53 EST


Ping ?
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:56, yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:03, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 15:25 +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 04:25, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Correct misuse of 0x%d in logging messages.
>>>>
>> []
>>> why not use like this : dev_dbg(&h->pdev->dev, " Max outstanding
>>> commands = %#x\nâ ?
>>> %#x will add 0x prefix automatically .
>>
>> It's generally a consistency thing.
>> A 0 value would be emitted as 0 and not 0x0.
>>
> i try on my ubuntu ,
>
> static int __init throtl_init(void)
> {
> printk("module init test: %#x %p\n", 0, (void *)0x123);
> return 0;
>
> }
>
> module_init(throtl_init);
>
> #uname -a
> Linux ubuntu 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 09:43:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> #dmesg
> [259356.375586] module init test: 0x0 0000000000000123
>
> it seems donât need 0x%x for 0, just need %#x for all numbers.
> there are lots of use like this, i can change them if needed:
>
> # egrep -r -i '0x%\d*x' . | wc -l
> 11776
>
>
> Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/