Re: [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations

[Chenhui Zhao]

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 17:20 +0800, b29983@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >  @@ -71,7 +56,7 @@ static void mpc85xx_give_timebase(void)
> >                barrier();
> >        tb_req = 0;
> >
> >  -     mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(1);
> >  +     qoriq_pm_ops->freeze_time_base(1);
>
> freeze_time_base() takes a bool.  Use true/false.

OK.

> >   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> >        /*
> >         * e5500/e6500 have a workaround for erratum A-006958 in place
> >  @@ -104,7 +89,7 @@ static void mpc85xx_give_timebase(void)
> >        while (tb_valid)
> >                barrier();
> >
> >  -     mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(0);
> >  +     qoriq_pm_ops->freeze_time_base(0);
> >
> >        local_irq_restore(flags);
> >   }
> >  @@ -127,20 +112,10 @@ static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void)
> >   }
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> >  -static void smp_85xx_mach_cpu_die(void)
> >  +static void e500_cpu_idle(void)
>
> This is not the function that gets called during normal cpu idle, and 
> it
> shouldn't be named to look like it is.

Sorry, it's a typo. It shoule be "e500_cpu_die".

> >   {
> >  -     unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >        u32 tmp;
> >
> >  -     local_irq_disable();
> >  -     idle_task_exit();
> >  -     generic_set_cpu_dead(cpu);
> >  -     mb();
> >  -
> >  -     mtspr(SPRN_TCR, 0);
> >  -
> >  -     cur_cpu_spec->cpu_down_flush();
> >  -
> >        tmp = (mfspr(SPRN_HID0) & ~(HID0_DOZE|HID0_SLEEP)) | HID0_NAP;
> >        mtspr(SPRN_HID0, tmp);
> >        isync();
> >  @@ -151,6 +126,25 @@ static void smp_85xx_mach_cpu_die(void)
> >        mb();
> >        mtmsr(tmp);
> >        isync();
> >  +}
> >  +
> >  +static void qoriq_cpu_dying(void)
> >  +{
> >  +     unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >  +
> >  +     hard_irq_disable();
> >  +     /* mask all irqs to prevent cpu wakeup */
> >  +     qoriq_pm_ops->irq_mask(cpu);
> >  +     idle_task_exit();
> >  +
> >  +     mtspr(SPRN_TCR, 0);
> >  +     mtspr(SPRN_TSR, mfspr(SPRN_TSR));
> >  +
> >  +     cur_cpu_spec->cpu_down_flush();
> >  +
> >  +     generic_set_cpu_dead(cpu);
> >  +
> >  +     e500_cpu_idle();
>
> Why is something that claims to be applicable to all qoriq directly 
> calling
> an e500v2-specific function?

Added "#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_E500MC" in the following patch.

> Could you explain irq_mask()?  Why would there still be IRQs destined 
> for
> this CPU at this point?

This function just masks irq by setting the registers in RCPM (for 
example, RCPM_CPMIMR, RCPM_CPMCIMR). Actually, all irqs to this CPU 
have been migrated to other CPUs.

> @@ -431,21 +415,9 @@ void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void)
> >                smp_85xx_ops.probe = NULL;
> >        }
> >
> >  -     np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, mpc85xx_smp_guts_ids);
> >  -     if (np) {
> >  -             guts = of_iomap(np, 0);
> >  -             of_node_put(np);
> >  -             if (!guts) {
> >  -                     pr_err("%s: Could not map guts node 
> > address\n",
> >  -                                                             
> > __func__);
> >  -                     return;
> >  -             }
> >  -             smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = mpc85xx_give_timebase;
> >  -             smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = mpc85xx_take_timebase;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> >  -             ppc_md.cpu_die = smp_85xx_mach_cpu_die;
> >  +     ppc_md.cpu_die = qoriq_cpu_dying;
> >   #endif
>
> Shouldn't you make sure there's a valid qoriq_pm_ops before setting
> cpu_die()?  Or make sure that qoriq_cpu_dying() works regardless.
>
> -Scott

This patch is just for e500v2. The following patches will handle the 
case of e500mc, e5500 and e6500.

-Chenhui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/