Re: [PATCH 0/2] New NAND chip IDs

From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Tue Jul 28 2015 - 11:13:25 EST


On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:10:13 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Hans,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:49:58 +0200
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 07/28/2015 04:29 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > the NAND chips on Cubietech boards are not known to Linux.
> > >
> > > I used Petros Angelatos' patch from sunxi experimental tree for one chip and
> > > added another chip.
> > >
> > > I hope it's ok to send both patches to avoid merge conflict.
> >
> > I do not think that these patches are a good idea, this will lead to an
> > ever growing manual maintained list of ids, and that is not maintainable
> > IMHO.
> >
> > For Samsung chips we only need the ecc strength and size the rest is already
> > detected on the fly, and I've a patch in my personal tree to get the
> > ecc strengt and size from the nand without needing to have an entry per
> > chip:
> >
> > https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/53b335d33232753b7aa70298009158baadf5a6bf
> >
> > This is IMHO a much better solution.
>
> Hm, IMHO it's not: the nand ids table also store information about
> supported NAND timings, and maybe we'll have to add new things (like
> the read-retry implementation to use for a specific chip).

Oops, sorry, I didn't look at the patch before answering, and I thought
you were suggesting to put the information inside the DT.
Forget my previous answer.


--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/