Re: [PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device removal from CPU online

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-07-15, 23:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, I've just seen that patch, but it doesn't modify bus_probe_device() AFAICS.

Why is bus_probe_device() required to be modified?

I wrote this patch to propagate -EPROBE_DEFER from the ->init()
callback, which is called from cpufreq_register_driver().

And that worked after my patch..

> Plus we also ignore the return value of cpufreq_add_dev() in the
> hotplug notifier callback.

My use case needed it for the subsys callback.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/