Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Yes, we could change the loop to that. I was just following the same 
> logic in the native code.

Well since the native code obviously doesn't involve the
threshold/clear_pending, it looks fine to me. Its just the pv version I
think should be updated.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/