Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: Make if condition correctly due to the operator order

[Minfei Huang]

On 07/27/15 at 10:20am, yalin wang wrote:
> 
> > On Jul 26, 2015, at 23:55, Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > The if condition will be always true, since the operator & has the high
> > priority than operator ||.
> > 
> > Use () to quote them to make the if condition correctly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > index c04dff9..d9acc6a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static ftrace_func_t ftrace_ops_get_list_func(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
> > 	 * If this is a dynamic ops or we force list func,
> > 	 * then it needs to call the list anyway.
> > 	 */
> > -	if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC || FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC)
> > +	if (ops->flags & (FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC || FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC))
> > 		return ftrace_ops_list_func;
> > 
> > 	return ftrace_ops_get_func(ops);
> > â 
> i think the original code is correct, while your change is wrong from logic.
> am i missing something ?
> Thanks
> 

Thanks for your correction.

Yes. The previous code matches the logic.

Nacked.

Thanks
Minfei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/