Re: Dealing with the NMI mess

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Jul 24 2015 - 04:13:45 EST


On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:59:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmmm. I thought watchpoints were "before the instruction" too, but
> that's just because I haven't used them in ages, and I didn't remember
> the details. I just looked it up.
>
> You're right - the memory watchpoints trigger after the instruction
> has executed, so RF isn't an issue. So yes, the only issue is
> instruction breakpoints, and those are the only ones we need to clear.
>
> And that makes it really easy.
>
> So yes, I agree. We only need to clear all kernel breakpoints.

But but but, we can access userspace with !IF, imagine someone doing:

local_irq_disable();
copy_from_user_inatomic();

and as luck would have it, there's a breakpoint on the user memory we
just touched. And we go and disable a user breakpoint.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/