[PATCH v2] time.c::timespec_trunc: fix nanosecond file time rounding

From: Karsten Blees
Date: Thu Jun 25 2015 - 08:14:07 EST


timespec_trunc() avoids rounding if granularity <= nanoseconds-per-jiffie
(or TICK_NSEC). This optimization assumes that:

1. current_kernel_time().tv_nsec is already rounded to TICK_NSEC (i.e.
with HZ=1000 you'd get 1000000, 2000000, 3000000... but never 1000001).
This is no longer true (probably since hrtimers introduced in 2.6.16).

2. TICK_NSEC is evenly divisible by all possible granularities. This may
be true for HZ=100, 250, 1000, but obviously not for HZ=300 /
TICK_NSEC=3333333 (introduced in 2.6.20).

Thus, sub-second portions of in-core file times are not rounded to on-disk
granularity. I.e. file times may change when the inode is re-read from disk
or when the file system is remounted.

This affects all file systems with file time granularities > 1 ns and < 1s,
e.g. CEPH (1000 ns), UDF (1000 ns), CIFS (100 ns), NTFS (100 ns) and FUSE
(configurable from user mode via struct fuse_init_out.time_gran).

Steps to reproduce with e.g. UDF:

$ dd if=/dev/zero of=udfdisk count=10000 && mkudffs udfdisk
$ mkdir udf && mount udfdisk udf
$ touch udf/test && stat -c %y udf/test
2015-06-09 10:22:56.130006767 +0200
$ umount udf && mount udfdisk udf
$ stat -c %y udf/test
2015-06-09 10:22:56.130006000 +0200

Remounting truncates the mtime to 1 Âs.

Fix the rounding in timespec_trunc() and update the documentation.

timespec_trunc() is exclusively used to calculate inode's [acm]time (mostly
via current_fs_time()), and always with super_block.s_time_gran as second
argument. So this can safely be changed without side effects.

Note: This does _not_ fix the issue for FAT's 2 second mtime resolution,
as super_block.s_time_gran isn't prepared to handle different ctime /
mtime / atime resolutions nor resolutions > 1 second.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@xxxxxxx>
---

Am 17.06.2015 um 01:08 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Logically its ok. I might suggest cleaning it up as:
>
> if ((gran < 1) || (gran > NSEC_PER_SEC))
> WARN_ON(1); /* catch invalid granularity values */
> else if (gran == NSEC_PER_SEC)
> t.tv_nsec = 0; /* special case to avoid div */
> else if ((gran > 1) && ( gran < NSEC_PER_SEC))
> t.tv_nsec -= t.tv_nsec % gran;
> return t;
>
> Also it would be good to make it clear in the function comment that
> gran > NSEC_PER_SEC are invalid.
>
> thanks
> -john
>

I chose to stick to testing the most common cases first (1 ns and 1 s).
I don't think GCC would be smart enough to reoder the comparisons based
on 'unlikely()' in the WARN macro...

Thanks,
Karsten

kernel/time/time.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/time.c b/kernel/time/time.c
index 972e3bb..5733922 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time.c
@@ -287,26 +287,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies_to_usecs);
* @t: Timespec
* @gran: Granularity in ns.
*
- * Truncate a timespec to a granularity. gran must be smaller than a second.
- * Always rounds down.
- *
- * This function should be only used for timestamps returned by
- * current_kernel_time() or CURRENT_TIME, not with do_gettimeofday() because
- * it doesn't handle the better resolution of the latter.
+ * Truncate a timespec to a granularity. Always rounds down. gran must
+ * not be 0 nor greater than a second (NSEC_PER_SEC, or 10^9 ns).
*/
struct timespec timespec_trunc(struct timespec t, unsigned gran)
{
- /*
- * Division is pretty slow so avoid it for common cases.
- * Currently current_kernel_time() never returns better than
- * jiffies resolution. Exploit that.
- */
- if (gran <= jiffies_to_usecs(1) * 1000) {
+ /* Avoid division in the common cases 1 ns and 1 s. */
+ if (gran == 1) {
/* nothing */
- } else if (gran == 1000000000) {
+ } else if (gran == NSEC_PER_SEC) {
t.tv_nsec = 0;
- } else {
+ } else if (gran > 1 && gran < NSEC_PER_SEC) {
t.tv_nsec -= t.tv_nsec % gran;
+ } else {
+ WARN(1, "illegal file time granularity: %u", gran);
}
return t;
}
--
2.0.0.791.g124e248

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/