[PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Kill off intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl for good

[Alexander Shishkin]

The x86_lbr_exclusive commit (4807034248be "perf/x86: Mark Intel PT and
LBR/BTS as mutually exclusive") mistakenly moved intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl()
to perf_event.h, while another commit (a46a2300019 "perf: Simplify the
branch stack check") removed it in favor of needs_branch_stack().

This patch gets rid of intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl() for good.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 06a9ab79d6..0cd854671b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -794,20 +794,6 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
 
-static inline bool intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	/* user explicitly requested branch sampling */
-	if (has_branch_stack(event))
-		return true;
-
-	/* implicit branch sampling to correct PEBS skid */
-	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
-	    x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2)
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	if (event->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS &&
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/