Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Handle tick_broadcast_enter() failure gracefully

[Sudeep Holla]

Hi Preeti,

On 07/05/15 06:26, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> When a CPU has to enter an idle state where tick stops, it makes a call
> to tick_broadcast_enter(). The call will fail if this CPU is the
> broadcast CPU. Today, under such a circumstance, the arch cpuidle code
> handles this CPU.  This is not convincing because not only are we not
> aware what the arch cpuidle code does, but we also do not account for
> the idle state residency time and usage of such a CPU.
>
> This scenario can be handled better by simply asking the cpuidle
> governor to choose an idle state where in ticks do not stop. To
> accommodate this change move the setting of runqueue idle state from the
> core to the cpuidle driver, else the rq->idle_state will be set wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Based on linux-pm/bleeding-edge

I am unable to apply this patch cleanly on linux-pm/bleeding-edge
I think it conflicts with few patches that Rafael posted recently
which are in the branch now.

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/