[PATCH RFC 15/15] uaccess: decouple preemption from the pagefault logic

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Wed May 06 2015 - 13:52:03 EST


As the fault handlers now all rely on the pagefault_disabled() checks
and implicit preempt_disable() calls by pagefault_disable() have been
made explicit, we can completely rely on the pagefault_disableD counter.

So let's no longer touch the preempt count when disabling/enabling
pagefaults. After a call to pagefault_disable(), pagefault_disabled()
will return true, but in_atomic() won't.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/uaccess.h | 16 ++--------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index 23290cc..83f2a7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
#ifndef __LINUX_UACCESS_H__
#define __LINUX_UACCESS_H__

-#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>

@@ -20,17 +19,11 @@ static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_dec(void)
* These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler. If disabled, it will
* not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
*
- * We increase the preempt and the pagefault count, to be able to distinguish
- * whether we run in simple atomic context or in a real pagefault_disable()
- * context.
- *
- * For now, after pagefault_disabled() has been called, we run in atomic
- * context. User access methods will not sleep.
- *
+ * User access methods will not sleep when called from a pagefault_disabled()
+ * environment.
*/
static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
{
- preempt_count_inc();
pagefault_disabled_inc();
/*
* make sure to have issued the store before a pagefault
@@ -47,11 +40,6 @@ static inline void pagefault_enable(void)
*/
barrier();
pagefault_disabled_dec();
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- preempt_count_dec();
-#else
- preempt_enable();
-#endif
}

/*
--
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/