[PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 85/90] ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk

From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Tue May 05 2015 - 16:58:11 EST


3.13.11-ckt20 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20P=C3=B6hn?= <sebastian.poehn@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 2ab957492d13bb819400ac29ae55911d50a82a13 ]

Initial discussion was:
[FYI] xfrm: Don't lookup sk_policy for timewait sockets

Forwarded frames should not have a socket attached. Especially
tw sockets will lead to panics later-on in the stack.

This was observed with TPROXY assigning a tw socket and broken
policy routing (misconfigured). As a result frame enters
forwarding path instead of input. We cannot solve this in
TPROXY as it cannot know that policy routing is broken.

v2:
Remove useless comment

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Poehn <sebastian.poehn@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/ip_forward.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
index 31ee5c6..479e8a6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ int ip_forward(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct rtable *rt; /* Route we use */
struct ip_options *opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);

+ if (unlikely(skb->sk))
+ goto drop;
+
if (skb_warn_if_lro(skb))
goto drop;

--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/