[PATCH 188/208] x86/fpu: Factor out the exception error code handling code

[Ingo Molnar]

Factor out the FPU error code handling code from traps.c and fpu/internal.h
and move them close to each other.

Also convert the helper functions to 'struct fpu *', which further simplifies
them.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 33 ++--------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c          | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c             | 67 ++++++++-----------------------------------
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
index 7b62d9032623..dfdafea6e56f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ extern void fpu__init_system(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 extern void fpu__activate_curr(struct fpu *fpu);
 extern void fpstate_init(struct fpu *fpu);
 
-extern int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *, struct user_i387_struct *);
+extern int  dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *, struct user_i387_struct *);
+extern int  fpu__exception_code(struct fpu *fpu, int trap_nr);
 
 /*
  * High level FPU state handling functions:
@@ -467,34 +468,4 @@ static inline void user_fpu_begin(void)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
-/*
- * i387 state interaction
- */
-static inline unsigned short get_fpu_cwd(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
-		return tsk->thread.fpu.state.fxsave.cwd;
-	} else {
-		return (unsigned short)tsk->thread.fpu.state.fsave.cwd;
-	}
-}
-
-static inline unsigned short get_fpu_swd(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
-		return tsk->thread.fpu.state.fxsave.swd;
-	} else {
-		return (unsigned short)tsk->thread.fpu.state.fsave.swd;
-	}
-}
-
-static inline unsigned short get_fpu_mxcsr(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (cpu_has_xmm) {
-		return tsk->thread.fpu.state.fxsave.mxcsr;
-	} else {
-		return MXCSR_DEFAULT;
-	}
-}
-
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_FPU_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index b34c1a72d838..38274909e193 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <asm/fpu/internal.h>
 #include <asm/fpu/regset.h>
 #include <asm/fpu/signal.h>
+#include <asm/traps.h>
 
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 
@@ -749,3 +750,90 @@ int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *regs, struct user_i387_struct *ufpu)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_fpu);
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_X86_32 || CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION */
+
+/*
+ * x87 math exception handling:
+ */
+
+static inline unsigned short get_fpu_cwd(struct fpu *fpu)
+{
+	if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
+		return fpu->state.fxsave.cwd;
+	} else {
+		return (unsigned short)fpu->state.fsave.cwd;
+	}
+}
+
+static inline unsigned short get_fpu_swd(struct fpu *fpu)
+{
+	if (cpu_has_fxsr) {
+		return fpu->state.fxsave.swd;
+	} else {
+		return (unsigned short)fpu->state.fsave.swd;
+	}
+}
+
+static inline unsigned short get_fpu_mxcsr(struct fpu *fpu)
+{
+	if (cpu_has_xmm) {
+		return fpu->state.fxsave.mxcsr;
+	} else {
+		return MXCSR_DEFAULT;
+	}
+}
+
+int fpu__exception_code(struct fpu *fpu, int trap_nr)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (trap_nr == X86_TRAP_MF) {
+		unsigned short cwd, swd;
+		/*
+		 * (~cwd & swd) will mask out exceptions that are not set to unmasked
+		 * status.  0x3f is the exception bits in these regs, 0x200 is the
+		 * C1 reg you need in case of a stack fault, 0x040 is the stack
+		 * fault bit.  We should only be taking one exception at a time,
+		 * so if this combination doesn't produce any single exception,
+		 * then we have a bad program that isn't synchronizing its FPU usage
+		 * and it will suffer the consequences since we won't be able to
+		 * fully reproduce the context of the exception
+		 */
+		cwd = get_fpu_cwd(fpu);
+		swd = get_fpu_swd(fpu);
+
+		err = swd & ~cwd;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * The SIMD FPU exceptions are handled a little differently, as there
+		 * is only a single status/control register.  Thus, to determine which
+		 * unmasked exception was caught we must mask the exception mask bits
+		 * at 0x1f80, and then use these to mask the exception bits at 0x3f.
+		 */
+		unsigned short mxcsr = get_fpu_mxcsr(fpu);
+		err = ~(mxcsr >> 7) & mxcsr;
+	}
+
+	if (err & 0x001) {	/* Invalid op */
+		/*
+		 * swd & 0x240 == 0x040: Stack Underflow
+		 * swd & 0x240 == 0x240: Stack Overflow
+		 * User must clear the SF bit (0x40) if set
+		 */
+		return FPE_FLTINV;
+	} else if (err & 0x004) { /* Divide by Zero */
+		return FPE_FLTDIV;
+	} else if (err & 0x008) { /* Overflow */
+		return FPE_FLTOVF;
+	} else if (err & 0x012) { /* Denormal, Underflow */
+		return FPE_FLTUND;
+	} else if (err & 0x020) { /* Precision */
+		return FPE_FLTRES;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we're using IRQ 13, or supposedly even some trap
+	 * X86_TRAP_MF implementations, it's possible
+	 * we get a spurious trap, which is not an error.
+	 */
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 48dfcd9ed351..cab397d0085f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -708,8 +708,8 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_debug);
 static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
+	struct fpu *fpu = &task->thread.fpu;
 	siginfo_t info;
-	unsigned short err;
 	char *str = (trapnr == X86_TRAP_MF) ? "fpu exception" :
 						"simd exception";
 
@@ -717,8 +717,7 @@ static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
 		return;
 	conditional_sti(regs);
 
-	if (!user_mode(regs))
-	{
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
 			task->thread.error_code = error_code;
 			task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
@@ -730,62 +729,20 @@ static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
 	/*
 	 * Save the info for the exception handler and clear the error.
 	 */
-	fpu__save(&task->thread.fpu);
-	task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
+	fpu__save(fpu);
+
+	task->thread.trap_nr	= trapnr;
 	task->thread.error_code = error_code;
-	info.si_signo = SIGFPE;
-	info.si_errno = 0;
-	info.si_addr = (void __user *)uprobe_get_trap_addr(regs);
-	if (trapnr == X86_TRAP_MF) {
-		unsigned short cwd, swd;
-		/*
-		 * (~cwd & swd) will mask out exceptions that are not set to unmasked
-		 * status.  0x3f is the exception bits in these regs, 0x200 is the
-		 * C1 reg you need in case of a stack fault, 0x040 is the stack
-		 * fault bit.  We should only be taking one exception at a time,
-		 * so if this combination doesn't produce any single exception,
-		 * then we have a bad program that isn't synchronizing its FPU usage
-		 * and it will suffer the consequences since we won't be able to
-		 * fully reproduce the context of the exception
-		 */
-		cwd = get_fpu_cwd(task);
-		swd = get_fpu_swd(task);
+	info.si_signo		= SIGFPE;
+	info.si_errno		= 0;
+	info.si_addr		= (void __user *)uprobe_get_trap_addr(regs);
 
-		err = swd & ~cwd;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * The SIMD FPU exceptions are handled a little differently, as there
-		 * is only a single status/control register.  Thus, to determine which
-		 * unmasked exception was caught we must mask the exception mask bits
-		 * at 0x1f80, and then use these to mask the exception bits at 0x3f.
-		 */
-		unsigned short mxcsr = get_fpu_mxcsr(task);
-		err = ~(mxcsr >> 7) & mxcsr;
-	}
+	info.si_code = fpu__exception_code(fpu, trapnr);
 
-	if (err & 0x001) {	/* Invalid op */
-		/*
-		 * swd & 0x240 == 0x040: Stack Underflow
-		 * swd & 0x240 == 0x240: Stack Overflow
-		 * User must clear the SF bit (0x40) if set
-		 */
-		info.si_code = FPE_FLTINV;
-	} else if (err & 0x004) { /* Divide by Zero */
-		info.si_code = FPE_FLTDIV;
-	} else if (err & 0x008) { /* Overflow */
-		info.si_code = FPE_FLTOVF;
-	} else if (err & 0x012) { /* Denormal, Underflow */
-		info.si_code = FPE_FLTUND;
-	} else if (err & 0x020) { /* Precision */
-		info.si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * If we're using IRQ 13, or supposedly even some trap
-		 * X86_TRAP_MF implementations, it's possible
-		 * we get a spurious trap, which is not an error.
-		 */
+	/* Retry when we get spurious exceptions: */
+	if (!info.si_code)
 		return;
-	}
+
 	force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, task);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/