Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm: improve OOM mechanism v2

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Mon May 04 2015 - 14:02:38 EST


Hi Andrew,

since patches 8 and 9 are still controversial, would you mind picking
up just 1-7 for now? They're cleaunps nice to have on their own.

Thanks,
Johannes

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:05:46PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> There is a possible deadlock scenario between the page allocator and
> the OOM killer. Most allocations currently retry forever inside the
> page allocator, but when the OOM killer is invoked the chosen victim
> might try taking locks held by the allocating task. This series, on
> top of many cleanups in the allocator & OOM killer, grants such OOM-
> killing allocations access to the system's memory reserves in order
> for them to make progress without relying on their own kill to exit.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - drop GFP_NOFS deadlock fix (Dave Chinner)
> - drop low-order deadlock fix (Michal Hocko)
> - fix missing oom_lock in sysrq+f (Michal Hocko)
> - fix PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY retry condition (Michal Hocko)
> - ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS only for OOM victims, not all killed tasks (Tetsuo Handa)
> - bump OOM wait timeout from 1s to 5s (Vlastimil Babka & Michal Hocko)
>
> drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 2 +-
> drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 2 +
> include/linux/oom.h | 12 +-
> kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 20 ++--
> mm/oom_kill.c | 167 +++++++---------------------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 161 ++++++++++++---------------
> 7 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/