Re: Regression: Disk corruption with dm-crypt and kernels >= 4.0

[Abelardo Ricart III]

On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 17:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, May 01 2015 at 12:37am -0400,
> Abelardo Ricart III <aricart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I made sure to run a completely vanilla kernel when testing why I was 
> > suddenly
> > seeing some nasty libata errors with all kernels >= v4.0. Here's a snippet:
> > 
> > -------------------->8--------------------
> > [  165.592136] ata5.00: exception Emask 0x60 SAct 0x7000 SErr 0x800 action 
> > 0x6
> > frozen
> > [  165.592140] ata5.00: irq_stat 0x20000000, host bus error
> > [  165.592143] ata5: SError: { HostInt }
> > [  165.592145] ata5.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
> > [  165.592149] ata5.00: cmd 60/08:60:a0:0d:89/00:00:07:00:00/40 tag 12 ncq 
> > 4096
> > in
> >                         res 40/00:74:40:58:5d/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x60
> > (host bus error)
> > [  165.592151] ata5.00: status: { DRDY }
> > -------------------->8--------------------
> > 
> > After a few dozen of these errors, I'd suddenly find my system in read-only
> > mode with corrupted files throughout my encrypted filesystems (seemed like
> > either a read or a write would corrupt a file, though I could be mistaken). 
> > I
> > decided to do a git bisect with a random read-write-sync test to narrow down
> > the culprit, which turned out to be this commit (part of a series):
> > 
> > # first bad commit: [cf2f1abfbd0dba701f7f16ef619e4d2485de3366] dm crypt: 
> > don't
> > allocate pages for a partial request
> > 
> > Just to be sure, I created a patch to revert the entire nine patch series 
> > that
> > commit belonged to... and the bad behavior disappeared. I've now been 
> > running
> > kernel 4.0 for a few days without issue, and went so far as to stress test 
> > my
> > poor SSD for a few hours to be 100% positive.
> > 
> > Here's some more info on my setup.
> > 
> > -------------------->8--------------------
> > $ lsblk -f
> > NAME         FSTYPE      LABEL MOUNTPOINT
> > sda                  
> > ââsda1       vfat              /boot/EFI
> > ââsda2       ext4              /boot
> > ââsda3       LVM2_member
> >   ââSSD-root crypto_LUKS
> >   â ââroot   f2fs              /
> >   ââSSD-home crypto_LUKS
> >     ââhome   f2fs              /home
> > 
> > $ cat /proc/cmdline
> > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-linux-memnix cryptdevice=/dev/SSD/root:root:allow
> > -discards
> > root=/dev/mapper/root acpi_osi=Linux security=tomoyo
> > TOMOYO_trigger=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd intel_iommu=on
> > modprobe.blacklist=nouveau rw quiet
> > 
> > $ cat /etc/lvm/lvm.conf | grep "issue_discards"
> > issue_discards = 1
> > -------------------->8--------------------
> > 
> > If there's anything else I can do to help diagnose the underlying problem, 
> > I'm
> > more than willing.
> 
> The patchset in question was tested quite heavily so this is a
> surprising report.  I'm noticing you are opting in to dm-crypt discard
> support.  Have you tested without discards enabled?

I've disabled discards universally and rebuilt a vanilla kernel. After running
my heavy read-write-sync scripts, everything seems to be working fine now. I
suppose this could be something that used to fail silently before, but now
produces bad behavior? I seem to remember having something in my message log
about "discards not supported on this device" when running with it enabled
before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/