Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: make nohz_full imply isolcpus

[Chris Metcalf]

On 4/4/2015 10:10 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Rik, what's the change you're proposing that's similar to this one? Thanks!
> I don't have this particular one, and I like it.
>
> I know there are use cases where isolcpus= without
> nohz_full= makes sense, but I cannot think of the
> reverse.
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I'll push it via the tile tree unless someone would prefer otherwise.
(The tick_nohz_full_set_cpus() and tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() routines are in
earlier tile tree commits, the latter supporting a change to the tile network driver.)

Mike, I added your

Thumbs-Up-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> :-)

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/