Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_addr_t

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Apr 03 2015 - 23:34:59 EST


On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [+cc Sam (commented on previous versions), Russell, linux-arm-kernel, Ralf,
> linux-mips, Ben, linuxppc-dev, x86]
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:32:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:57:47PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > David Ahern found commit d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows
>> > to fit in upstream windows") broke booting on sparc/T5-8.
>> >
>> > In the boot log, there is
>> > pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address
>> > 0x110204000)
>> > but that only could happen when dma_addr_t is 32-bit.
>> >
>> > According to David Miller, all DMA occurs behind an IOMMU and these
>> > IOMMUs only support 32-bit addressing, therefore dma_addr_t is
>> > 32-bit on sparc64.
>> >
>> > Let's introduce pci_bus_addr_t instead of using dma_addr_t,
>> > and pci_bus_addr_t will be 64-bit on 64-bit platform or X86_PAE.
>> >
>> > Fixes: commit d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows")
>> > Fixes: commit 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB")
>> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #3.19
>> > ---
>> > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>> > drivers/pci/bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 12 ++++++------
>> > include/linux/pci.h | 12 +++++++++---
>> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> > index 7a8f1c5..6a5a269 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>> > #
>> > # PCI configuration
>> > #
>> > +config PCI_BUS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>> > + def_bool y if (64BIT || X86_PAE)
>> > + depends on PCI
>>
>> We're going to use pci_bus_addr_t in some places where we previously used
>> dma_addr_t, which means pci_bus_addr_t should be at least as large as
>> dma_addr_t. Can you enforce that directly, e.g., with something like this?
>>
>> def_bool y if (ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT || 64BIT || X86_PAE)

then should use

def_bool y if (ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT || 64BIT)

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/