Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)

[Hajime Tazaki]

Thanks Rusty,

At Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:59:39 +1030,
Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > the issue here is the decision between 'no-ops' and
> > 'assert(false)' depends on the context. an auto-generated
> > mechanism needs some hand-written parameters I think.
> 
> Yes, I used auto-generated (fprintf, abort) stubs for similar testing in
> pettycoin, where if it failed to link it would generate such stubs
> for undefined symbols.
> 
> It's not a panacea, but it helps speed up rejiggin after code changes.
> Generating noop stubs can actually make that process slower, as you can
> get failures because you now need to do something in that stub.

is it the following ? it's really cool stuff !

https://github.com/rustyrussell/pettycoin/blob/master/test/mockup.sh
 
-- Hajime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/