Re: [PATCH] block: drop extra (and bogus) printk

From: henrix
Date: Thu Mar 19 2015 - 14:41:41 EST


Ping? I've sent these 3 patches almost a month ago...

Cheers,
--
Luís

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:56:48PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> When setting an invalid scheduler through sysfs, two log entries will be
> added. Also, when running 'echo foo > /sys/block/DISK/queue/scheduler'
> the second one will includes the extra '\n':
>
> [10465.216944] elevator: type foo not found
> [10465.216953] elevator: switch to foo
> failed
>
> This patch simply drops the second printk().
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/elevator.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 59794d0d38e3..0ac9ea519201 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -997,7 +997,6 @@ ssize_t elv_iosched_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *name,
> if (!ret)
> return count;
>
> - printk(KERN_ERR "elevator: switch to %s failed\n", name);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/